Recent Posts

Showing posts with label cast albums. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cast albums. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

COME WITH ME

next to normal is easily one of the best contemporary musicals to date (and easily one of my personal favorites...ever).   It is everything a musical should be - moving, heartbreaking, haunting, thought provoking (with humorous moments), it has characters and a storyline which are mostly well thought out and  music that stays with you long after you have departed the theatre.  In an era of musical theatre in which the term "groundbreaking" is thrown around an awful lot to describe a show, next to normal just might be one of them.  next to normal challenges its audience to think beyond what you see, who you are and what you believe to be true.

next to normal is a story that mirrors what life can sometimes be like when life is spinning out of control - feeling alone and misunderstood but yet somehow being able to find a way back to the truth.  The show is the way it is now because of director Michael Grief and producer David Stone who took the existing book and music by Brian Yorkey and Tom Kitt (respectively) and tightened the story which was a little bit unclear and long and helped focus it into the Pulitzer Prize winning show that it has become.

It should be known that I have been a very big supporter of next to normal out of the gate, since I first discovered 2005 workshop/demo tracks on YouTube (when it was still called Feeling Electric - take a listen if you are so inclined to compare what it was to what its become).   Even though in its workshopped state, next to normal was a completely different show than it is now, the core of it was still compelling to me.  This contemporary musical about a dysfunctional family coping with loss and mental illness, was (and is even more-so now) deeply emotional, deeply moving and runs the gamut of emotions throughout the performance.  This is made true because in large part to the actors who inhabit the Goodman family (and supporting characters) in the touring cast.


Alice Ripley
Alice Ripley and next to normal have become synonymous with one another.  The show certainly wouldn't be what it is now without her and anyone who will have the pleasure of seeing her perform the role of Diana Goodman will see what a tour de force she is in the show.  Alice Ripley is no stranger to career defining roles.  Though she has had a long career on the Broadway stage and made her mark in the indie rock world, prior to next to normal, theatre audiences will likely first remember her as Violet - one-half of the Hilton conjoined-twins - in Side Show (which earned Ripley her first Tony nomination).   

As Diana Goodman in next to normal, Ripley is a revelation.  Reprising the role that earned her a Tony Award for best actress in a musical, Ripley brings a passionate and complex character to life with such heartbreaking pain and grief.  When she sings, she sings from her soul with such anguish that it is almost entrancing.  Ripley is by far the strongest component in next to normal, but she shares the stage equally with every member of the ensemble who helps to make up Diana in all her glory and her pain.

If Ripley is the strongest member of the cast then Los Angeles native, Emma Hunton (Natalie) is a close second and could not have been a more perfect daughter to Diana.  While the characters of Dan or even Gabe should have been the stronger supporting leads, it was Hunton whose performance really stood out in the cast.  She brought more depth and personality to the character than (I) have seen before with a pretty fantastic voice to boot.  As the child living the in the shadow of her more beloved brother (Superboy and the Invisible Girl), her Natalie was more sassy than angry and vulnerable than hurt.  Hunton as Natalie really fought to be seen in a family overrun by the past with such grace and force.
Curt Hansen, Emma Hunton, Preston Sadlier, Jeremy Kushiner, Alice Ripley, Asa Somers
As Gabe, Curt Hansen was ironically sometimes overshadowed by the vocal powerhouse of his sister Natalie (Hunton) while still very good.  Hansen managed to hit his character's high notes with relative ease and still managed to hold his own as he effortlessly soared through the three-story stage around poles and gliding up and down flights of stairs at a time.

Asa Somers (who played the role of Dr. Madden during the show's off-Broadway engagement at Second Stage Theatre) graduated to the role of Dan Goodman on-tour, Jeremy Kushnier as Dr. Madden/Dr. Fine and Preston K. Sadleir (who played was a very sweet Henry) rounded out the well-cast remaining members of the touring company of next to normal.

next to normal is a very important piece of contemporary musical theatre which in this case  legitimately earns the title of groundbreaking.  Other contemporary shows have brought something new (whether it be stylistic because of the music or staging) to the musical theatre landscape, but next to normal faces real issues like mental illness, suicide, drug addiction (which makes it sound like an episode of Oprah) head on and bares the soul of theses issues and its affect for all to see.

next to normal runs through January 2 at Los Angeles' Ahmanson Theatre.  Click for tickets and more information on the LA run or to find out when the show is coming to a city near you, click for tour info.

Saturday, November 06, 2010

SIMPLE JOYS

 Some of the most important memories of my childhood were the (many) times I saw Annie (the first time I saw the show at the Shubert Theatre in Los Angeles, Annie was played by the talented Marisa Morell). I was completely entranced (obsessed really) by the score, the music and the little girls singing and dancing (I always thought I should have been one of them) - I wore out several copies of the cassette version of the original cast recording and attempted (in vain) to learn how to play the piano score. Andrea McArdle (who in 1977 was the youngest actress nominated for best actress in a musical for playing the title role) was my first musical theatre hero because it was her voice I first heard as Annie on the Original Cast Recording (OCR). I tried so hard to sing like her when friends and I would perform numbers from Annie in my backyard while wearing our Annie dresses. Needless to say, Annie easily became an extremely important piece of my childhood (and undoubtedly countless other little girls)!

(l-r) Melody Hollis, Andrea McArdle & Mikey
Throughout the years, there have been too many times to count that I have seen various stage productions of Annie. For some reason, each production I have seen never seems to be as good as the one before it. One production in particular I saw not too long ago was such a disappointment that I began to think that maybe my memory of the show was far better than the reality. Then, I saw Musical Theatre West’s production of Annie and that all changed. My inaugural visit to Musical Theatre West (now in its 58th season at the beautiful Richard and Karen Carpenter Performing Arts Center) did not disappoint. To start, my childhood hero, Andrea McArdle returned to the show that made her famous, but this time starring as the villainess, Miss Hannigan. Some 30-plus years after making her Broadway debut as the famous red-headed orphan, it is not difficult or strange to see McArdle return to the show as Annie’s nemesis. Quite the opposite actually – it was easy and refreshing to see McArdle as a more subtle Hannigan (funnier without being too campy). While excellent, McArdle’s performance never outshined that of Melody Hollis (Annie) who was easily one of the best Annies I’ve seen to date. In addition to having a strong, beautifully belt-y voice, there was an effortless spunkiness and nurturing quality to Hollis and an easy chemistry between her and each of her co-stars.

I thought that the chorus numbers were fantastic but never realized how significant the Hooverville number was until the strong performance by this ensemble. The girls who played the orphans – Jena Rosen, Paige Befeler, Alexa Freeman, Maddison Milledge, Danielle Soibelman and Grace Kaufman – were strong and made the ensemble orphan numbers highly enjoyable. As Oliver Warbucks, it was easy to see Jeff Austin as both a gruff corporate billionaire who seemed to naturally soften when in the presence of the talented Melody Hollis.

It is because of McArdle’s performance of Annie on the (OCR) that drew me to the show so many years ago and it is because of her current association with the show that I rediscovered my love for it again. If I were a little girl now, I think Hollis would be the reason I would be drawn to Annie the same way I was drawn to McArdle – her performance was energetic and delightfully sung and is one of the main reasons why this production worked so well.

(l-r) Jeff Austin, Melody Hollis
Annie runs for only 14 performances through November 14 at the Carpenter Performing Arts Center, 6200 Atherton St., Long Beach, CA. 8 p.m. Thursdays and Fridays, 2 and 8 p.m. Saturdays, 2 p.m. Sundays. Call for tickets ($30-$80): (562) 856-1999 or www.musical.org.

Sunday, August 22, 2010

[part of it all]


Yesterday, I finally had an opportunity to see [title of show] at Los Angeles' Celebration Theatre (and it was fabulous).  I have been a fan of the show before (the real life) Hunter, Jeff, Susan and Heidi ever brought the show to Broadway and I was incredibly bummed when the show closed too soon; it was absolutely one of the Broadway shows that I was hoping I would get an opportunity to watch.  Unfortunately, when it ended, [title of show] only played 102 regular performances and 13 previews on the Broadway, but I am happy to report that it lives on in regional productions.

[title of show] really is a show for anyone who has ever had a dream to create.  Sure, its a show about "two guys writing a musical about two guys writing a musical" but at closer inspection, its not just about writing for musical theatre.  At its core, [title of show] has incredible heart fueled predominantly by the (characters of) Hunter and Jeff as they struggle to create a show for the NYMF (New York Musical Theatre Festival).  When you sit back and watch the show take shape, you see a show that is funny, well constructed and tells a good story with four pretty solid characters who truly bring their own personalities and contributions to the story (which is a good thing because they are based on the real-life Hunter Bell, Jeff Bowen, Susan Blackwell and Heidi Blickenstaff).  Its more than just a show about writing a musical, its a show about friendship, dreams coming true, the creative process of giving life to an art form and just the right amount of humor and emotional strife.  However if you aren't a musical theatre geek, some of the inside-musical-jokes may be lost on you.  Don't get me wrong, I think it will still be funny even if you aren't an insider, but will be even funnier if you are well, "in the know."

I have been listening to the cast recording of [title of show] for over two years now but first discovered it while bored one day at work and perusing the musical theatre annals of YouTube.  When I came across the first two or three episodes of the [title of show] show, I thought it was super campy and quirky and "at first I'll admit I was a little bit, WTF," but somehow it hooked me.   The chemistry between the four actors was apparent and it became hard to differentiate between the characters' personas and the real life personas in their series of vlogs.  Jeff was more of the straight-laced guy who seemed to keep everyone more (or less) grounded, Hunter was determined and focused, Susan was super quirky but hilarious and Heidi was the legit professional "Broadway actress." These vlogs were to me, brilliant on so many levels.  As I said, they were super campy and yet totally funny but SO smart!  How? Well thanks to YouTube, the [title of show] show was a totally free, grass roots marketing and publicity campaign that really did grow the brand, brought awareness to the show and it took off.  The [title of show] cast had complete autonomy on how they wanted to be portrayed, how often and when they posted their vlogs and each episode coincided with a number from the show.  BRILLIANCE, says I.  The [title of show] show could also be viewed as a companion piece to the actual [title of show] (musical show).   Either way, it will make sense if you (carefully) listen to [title of show] and then watch the [title of show] show. See what I mean? Brilliance.

As a minor PS, I have to again discuss that [title of show] also has one of my favorite ballads ever in it.  I won't be repetitive because I wrote about A Way Back to Then in a previous post (so if you are so inclined, you can read it here).  This song is (in many ways) about me and hearing it live (though I didn't love the performer's voice who sang it when I saw the show) it was still emotional because not only does it describe me, but many-a geeked out theatre fans out there too. 

I recently re-watched this (see below).  When it was closing, the folks at [title of show] reached out to their fans and 600 of us participated in this project - big time Broadway folks and regular peeps alike - all of whom loved and supported [title of show]; I think I'm in good company.  See if you can find me:







I heart [tos]!
If you have an opportunity to see [tos] in your town, do it! 

Monday, August 16, 2010

THE OLD RED HILLS OF...WASHINGTON HEIGHTS

The end of an opening act1:
God Bless the sight
Of the old hills of Georgia
The Old Red Hills of Home
(Kneel Down to)
Praise those who'd fight
For the Old Hills of Georgia
For those proud and valiant men
We'll sing "Dixie" once again
For the men of Marrietta
For the the brothers of Cobb County
For the fathers of Atlanta
For the patriarchs
Who gave everything for Georgia
And the Old Red Hills of Home


The end of Act 12:
Look at the fireworks...
Look at the fireworks...
Look at the fireworks...
Look at the fireworks...
Light up the night sky...
Light up the night sky...
En Washington--
Look at the fireworks...
Look at the fireworks...
Light up the night sky...
Light up the night sky...
En Washington Heights!



Two vastly different shows that take place in eras that spans many, many years; two of my favorite modern musical theatre writers/composers whose styles are so very different. I listen to their work when I need inspiration because these shows elicit such different emotions and reactions in me. These shows never fail to remind me why I admire thes writers of these original musicals, what I love about the theatre and why I have chosen to do what I'm doing: bridging a gap and creating opportunities. Thank you, JRB & LMM!


1. The Old Red Hills of Home from Parade by Jason Robert Brown
2. Blackout from In the Heights by Lin-Manuel Miranda

Friday, October 02, 2009

YOU DON'T KNOW THIS MAN

Whenever I go to the theater and see something so beautiful, smart & moving the endorphins somehow kick in and I get giddy with excitement. Tonight, seeing Jason Robert Brown's Tony Award Winning Parade at the Mark Taper Forum was one of those amazing nights. Sure, I happen to think JRB is just a phenomenal talent and I seem to connect to some facet of his work more than with any other composer, but...Parade is really, really, really good. I've blogged about Parade before but this is a newer version of the show that has been downsized from the original production when the show was staged at the Donmar Warehouse in 2007.

I have been impatiently awaiting Parade since the Taper announced it as part of the 2009-2010 season. This is another show that I never got to see (until now), but discovered and fell in love with it through its cast recording (for which another was made following the Donmar Warehouse production). In the original cast recording, I liked Brent Carver quite a bit as Leo Frank and wondered who might be cast in this LA version. I had no real reaction when I read about the casting of T.R. Knight.

Parade however, was discussed (more than it would have) since T.R. Knight's casting (his first gig post-Grey's Anatomy). A well-known celebrity blogger who I don't particularly care for even discussed it which I guess makes it a "big deal". I had no idea what to expect of Knight though and went into the show with an open mind. After all, if JRB had any say in the casting of his male lead, he wouldn't have agreed to a schlub of an actor with no singing chops, right? For the record, I haven't seen a single episode of Grey's Anatomy, so I didn't have any opinion towards Knight as an actor much less a singer. Knight's performance was actually quite good - he played a cold yet vulnerable & definitely quirky Leo Frank who opened up by the end of the show (its amazing what an intermission can do, huh)? I completely bought into his character and there were moments when I was completely taken with his performance. There were other times, when I realized that belting isn't so much his forte. There were moments during "Come Up To My Office" and "All the Wasted Time" where he was really selling his performance, singing it incredibly and then...he belted and it was actually a little distracting and pulled me out of the moment. For the most part though, he was fantastic!

In addition...what a cast!!! Wow, wow, wow! I recall being impressed when I read the final casting for the show, but I totally forgot until I took a look at the program. The cast boasts: Lara Pulver (who returns to the role of Lucille Frank from the Donmar Warehouse production) who I just loved (and loved more than Carolee Carmello from the Broadway production), Christian Hoff (Tony Award winner for Jersey Boys) who makes evil look so good, Phoebe Strole (Anna from the Broadway production of Spring Awakening), Michael Berresse (director of my personal favorite, [title of show]) who reunited with his A Chorus Line co-star Charlotte d'Amboise (Tony nominee for her role as Cassie in the revival of A Chorus Line) and Davis Gaines (who was a pleasant surprise to see and ended up being my personal favorite from his long run here in LA as the title role in The Phantom of the Opera). I just can't believe what a strong & amazing cast this is! This production with its high energy, amazing voices and ridiculously talented cast, undoubtedly belongs on the Broadway stage...again. Though I've never seen the Hal Prince staged version of this show (and I am quite an admirer of him), I think Rob Ashford did a hell of a job directing and choreographing the show. There was something so perfect about the dancing throughout the show that emphasized and and captured the meaning that I loved and worked so well.

If you have any doubt...check out the clips of the show courtesy of the Center Theatre Group:



The only problem that I found with the show was that it was extremely hard to hear some of JRB's intricate piano riffs. I could hear them so clearly in cast recordings (and even in the clip above) but found them either difficult to hear or heard what I thought were simplified versions of the music tonight. There was also the issue of almost every actor (except maybe Knight and Pulver) who played multiple roles which made the show just a little bit confusing (particularly if you weren't familiar with the storyline). I quickly got over that fact because I thought almost everything else about the show was so strong.

I guess at this point I should also mention that though my enthusiasm is high for Parade, it is a very, very dark show and perhaps it isn't what people think it will be. As stated from Center Theatre Group:

"A shameful event in American history and a poignant love story are at the heart of Parade…[which] follows the true story of the arrest, conviction and lynching of Leo Frank in post-Civil War Atlanta, Georgia. Mary Phagan, a 13-year-old factory worker, has been murdered on the day of the 1913 Confederate Memorial Day parade. Frank, the factory's superintendent and a Jewish outsider, is immediately cast as a suspect. As the media frenzy ensues, with journalists thirsting for news to boost circulations and ambitious politicians seeking votes, Frank — the transplanted Yankee — becomes the scapegoat. His wife, Lucille, passionately works for her husband's release from jail but public hatred continues to rise to a fever pitch. Despite the terrible circumstance, Leo and Lucille find a renewed commitment to each other as well as a moment of transcendent grace in their tragedy."

I knew this going in, I knew that it wouldn't end happily (its not a spoiler, its a tragic historical fact) and I also figured this show wouldn't be for everyone, but the people who were there I assume wanted to be. Yet when after intermission, I saw huge gaping holes in the theater, I was a little bit surprised. Its hard to say what patrons were thinking walking into Parade. I felt like more people returned after intermission when I saw Spring Awakening at the Ahmanson last year (and there were some pretty graphic scenes) particularly when I looked out and saw that the majority of the audience were 60+ years old). An entire second row I think emptied out after intermission and I really, really didn't understand that. I haven't walked out of any show (I might have really wanted to with some shows) but I guess I don't understand how deeply Parade affected some audience members to warrant leaving. Personally, I didn't leave the theater feeling somber and horrified (though I was horrified at the fate of Leo Frank and this tragic story). I left the Taper feeling revived and grateful to be able to support some of the best musical theater I think LA has seen in years!

At the end of the day though, I think it is it fair to say that for me, aside from thinking that Parade was fantastic and grateful for it fueling my theater-deprived soul, seeing Davis Gaines back on stage also brought back some kind of reminiscence of my youth. As much as I adore JRB and Parade, there is also something familiar and comforting seeing Davis Gaines back at The Music Center...which kind of makes me love the show that much more. All and all, this was quite a satisfying evening spent at the theater...partially because of being seated front row center, but mostly because of this amazingly special show.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

LET THE SUN SHINE IN

I've never been a fan of Hair.  It was groundbreaking in its time, but I never really "felt" it all these years.  I sang the title song once in some performancey thing I did and I thought it was all a little too before my time.  I knew all of the songs that had become mainstream like "Aquarius," "Let the Sunshine In" and lesser known songs from the show (if any were considered "lesser known") like "Easy to Be Hard" and "Frank Mills" but the show as a whole never really did anything for me...until recently.
 
Hair has come back.  It is in its second revival and now playing 8-shows-a week at the Al Hirshfield on Broadway and the cast is killing it!  Wow.  Gavin Creel is a personal favorite of mine and I've been loosely following the show since its Central Park revival last year and even more closely since Creel took over the role of Claude from Jonathan Groff.  Cut to April 30, 2009 -- "the Tribe" from Hair appeared on the Letterman show recreating a 40-year-old performance from the original Broadway cast at the Ed Sullivan Theater.  To say they were just fantastic is an understatement.  I LOVED it and I've never loved Hair in any incarnation.


After seeing this performance, I turned the corner on my opinion of Hair.  Yesterday, the album dropped (in digital release) on iTunes and I have been ob-sessed with it.  For the first time, this show has a great energy and spunk to me...and I've never heard that from  any recording or performance before.  I've gotta say, there's nothing like Gavin Creel's voice - the man is amazing and his Tony nom is much deserved (as is Will Swenson's - LOVE him too)!  This is how much I like Hair: I'm actually rooting for it over my old favorite West Side Story (in the best revival of a musical category) in this year's awards.  If I can go there then it must be really special!
 

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

WISH I WERE HERE

Every time I discover a new musical, I suppose I explore it in phases and varying degrees of depth.  Currently, I'm in phase "obsessive-critical-analysis" with next to normal and I have to say I really love it!  I love the story, the acting, the music, the emotion, the use of staging & characters, the obvious and all of the subtleties.  I have said that I loved recent shows like [title of show], Spring Awakening and In the Heights and I still do, but all of these shows are so different and there is not comparing any of them.  And yet, there is something unique about a show like next to normal.  From what I've seen and heard, I think it is an example of what the American musical should be and it brings a fresh approach to the genre.   

**For those concerned, worry not, there are no spoilers in this post!**

Since the exclusive iTunes release of next to normal, I haven't been able to stop listening to it.  Each time I hear it, I listen for new subtleties, new ways of understanding the show.  My belief in the strength and love for this show is similar to that of The Last 5 Years and goodness knows, I've blogged a lot about that show (go to the link if you have to know what I'm taking about).  I was introduced to and fascinated by The Last 5 Years something like 4-years-ago and this is the first show since then that is as compelling to me.  Its thrilling to see a show on Broadway that isn't fluff and that is incredibly satisfying and real.  From what I've heard, the songs in next to normal are more of a narrative of each character that move the story along instead of characters who break into song while halting the scene to do so.  There is reflection from each character about not only their own situations but about the story line too.  As important as that is though, the plot itself is incredibly relevant and hits on what seems like as many emotions a person can have at some point in their lives.  

What I appreciate about next to normal is the similarities to real life which is never easy and has moments of heartache from time to time.  And like real life, you come back from that, you become stronger, you learn more about life and you become hopeful once again.  The incredible thing is that this show does this.  In this two hour show, you come into it feeling eager, anxious about what it is going to happen.  If you allow yourself to take the journey with the Goodman family (I love the not-so-subtlety of the surname of the family), they will break you down and by the end of the show, build you back up and give you the possibility of hope.  Its truly an amazingly phenomenal show.  Watch the video clips of the show and notice how in those few moments, what outstanding actors -- every single one of them -- were cast in next to normal.  Maybe its because I am obsessed with the show (and know what's going on), but I am mesmerized and I am practically in tears, particularly in the "I Am the One" clip.

When it opened, critics lauded Spring Awakening as "ground breaking" and though I loved it, I don't quite agree with that claim, nor do I think that because of Spring Awakening, that "Broadway will never be the same again".  I do believe that while it made an impact, it is next to normal that is more ground breaking and because of the subject matter and the honesty of its portrayal, that Broadway will never be the same again.  I believe that the success of Spring Awakening validated the rejuvenation of the rock musical and helped young people or those turned off by the idea of a sung-through, old-fashioned musical, look at musical theatre in a new light.  next to normal is all of those things and more -- a rock musical, honest, edgy, & daring.

Take the ride with next to normal, you won't be disappointed.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

A LIGHT IN THE DARK

Welcome to a finally new and updated look here. This is what you get thanks to a few hours of procrastination.

*     *     * 

Not so long ago, I was concerned about the future of Broadway due to what seemed like a mass exodus as shows were closing right and left. Between September 28, 2008 - January 18, 2009, Broadway saw thirteen shows close. Though I knew some great new revivals were scheduled to open, I was concerned by the lack of a quality original piece. Would the Great White Way be deluged by yet another jukebox musical or another based on a movie, tv show?  Though I loved seeing some of my favorite shows revived, I was still interested in seeing stories that new writers could create.  Was it that tough to mount something original again and was our struggling economy to blame?  

Thanks to next to normal, I am no longer questioning the future of the American musical.  As excited as I was about my beloved [title of show] last season, I have to say I am even more thrilled about the spectacular musical, next to normal.  [title of show] was a quirky, fun and in some ways a nostalgic show that reminded us of who we are and what it takes to achieve our dreams, but next to normal which is an entirely different kind of show and yet is one that just excites me!

next to normal shows the lengths to which two parents will go to keep themselves sane and their family’s world intact. With a provocative contemporary score of more than 30 original songs, this groundbreaking new musical explores how one suburban household copes with crisis.
From the producer of WICKED and the director of RENT, and starring Tony Award® nominee Alice Ripley, next to normal arrives on Broadway straight from its sold-out engagements at both NY’s Second Stage Theatre and DC’s Arena Stage.
The above blurb from the show's website doesn't give away anything plot-wise, nor does it come close to accurately describing what next to normal is about.  What next to normal is, is an incredible small, story-driven show with electrifying talent and beautifully written music and lyrics.  In an era when both Hollywood and Broadway are keen on big, over-the-top money making films and shows, it is always refreshing when success finds a film/show because it is a quality piece of work from all angles.  Broadway (and Hollywood) are obviously businesses that need to make money in order to survive, but sometimes I am bothered when I think choices are made purely in terms of money instead of choosing something in which I wonder if artistic value was ever considered.  

I first discovered next to normal in its workshopped form, when it was called "Feeling Electric" (2002) which later moved to the NY Musical Theater Festival in 2005.  It was the 2002 workshop version that I fell in love with next to normal.  Back then, the story was so different and the dynamics between the family members weren't as flushed out or solid but the concept and storyline were apparent and the music was still beautiful.  A song I particularly appreciated -- Funny Love -- has since been cut from the Broadway version, but it was so beautiful and described the relationship between the couple, Dan & Diana (this was during a version of the show when I don't think the characters actually had names yet).  As much as I appreciated the song & miss it from the final version of the show, it just doesn't fit into this incarnation of the show.

On April 15,  next to normal  opened to great reviews with (mostly) the same cast as the Arena Theatre production.  Notably missing is Brian d'Arcy James (replaced by J. Robert Spencer) who had a previous engagement as the title role in Shrek the Musical.  Personally, I think the characters in  next to normal are so complex and meaty that it would be a shame to have to give up.  Though I love Brian d'Arcy James and was so sad to see him leave the role of Dan, I just  love the casting of  J. Robert Spencer and am more than pleased with his take on the role.  The casting of the other roles I think were well chosen and I can only say so much about it having not actually seen the show yet.  Having said that, I think it should be known that Alice Ripley undeniably deserves a Tony Award.

Alice Ripley is truly a force to be reckoned with.  She plays such a challenging character with such complex emotions between two opposite ends of the spectrum every night.  My god, just hearing her in the cast recording of this show not only moves me, but allows anyone to hear how powerful an actress she is.  In every single song on the cast recording, her pain, struggle, joys, fears, sorrows, quirkiness are all more than apparent and well performed. If I can get this from the audio, imagine how powerful she is in person?!  I've been a fan of her for years and to quote Hunter in [title of show] she really is "fierce!"

Need I say more?  If you need more proof, see the video preview courtesy of BroadwayWorld.com and then get tickets.

Friday, December 05, 2008

DREAMS COME TRUE

Regardless of how you feel about Broadway, watch:



and then read this (the excerpt/nutshell/impact of what happened is below ):
"At the end of the final take the cast began to clap for Nicholas, they completely encircled him and the cast kept clapping for him, they wrapped around him and clapped and clapped and clapped. The look on Nicholas' face at that point, the fact he was soaking up all that support, he was soaking up all the faith they had in him, at that moment the look on his face seemed like he could believe in his own dreams, he could go where he wanted to go, it was the most wonderful transformation, because in the beginning he was scared, but by that final moment,-that final take with them all around him, he was transformed." What a gift, a truly priceless gift.

What a heartwarming gift of hope and inspiration for the holidays. Thank you LMM, In the Heights cast & crew, Nicholas and everyone who made this happen! This is why the Broadway community is awesome (x 96,000)!

Sunday, November 02, 2008

PACIENCIA Y FE

I am almost embarrassed to say that I am behind. Every year, I am very well aware of the new musicals that hit the Great White Way...and yet, I don't really catch onto any of them until the following season. Why, I'm not sure. I like to blame the fact that I'm on the left coast but that's really not a good excuse because I know which shows are buzz-worthy and critically acclaimed and starring Broadway's most talented...and yet, for some reason it takes an entire season before I invest myself in them. Its not like I am reading about these shows or performers before I decide to take the leap. Quite the contrary! Usually I am actually an entire season behind to begin with and am spending my time listening, digesting, understanding, and...geez, it sounds like I actually study these shows (ok, I suppose I sorta do). With that said, last week I finally bought and caught onto the wonder that is In The Heights.

I had heard of In The Heights, I watched the cast perform on the 2008 Tony Awards, and until then, I was unsure of the idea of the story having never seen the show or heard the music. All I knew is that on the telecast, Lin-Manuel Miranda was rapping. That's different.
"Hmm, that's interesting," I thought. "I wonder how that works. It probably works, but...rapping on Broadway? Hmm..."
Of course it "works", after all, In The Heights won several Tonys in 2008: best musical, best original score (Lin-Manuel Miranda), best choreography (Andy Blankenbuehler). Accolades aside, what I've appreciated about In The Heights is that it is a perfect combination of what Broadway was with what it has become. The music is fantastic and takes you into the world of Puerto Ricans living in Washington Heights -- it makes you want to get up and dance, makes you feel hopeful and for me, it felt so honest. This is one of those shows that you don't have to see, to know that it is going to be great.

I just re-watched the cast's performance on the Tony Awards of the songs In the Heights and 96,000 and they were amazing! The music and the choreography were incredible! One of the best things about In The Heights is that its not what most people envision a musical to be. Its fresh, vibrant, doesn't have "cheezy" music from your grandparents generation, it isn't a jukebox musical or based on a movie. All of it is original -- the concept, the book and music and even the style of music (for a Broadway stage) because In The Heights is a musical with freestyle rap and salsa dancing...with a theatrical influence and was the brainchild of Lin-Manuel Miranda during his college years at Wesleyan University.

Reading stories about people's inspiration completely fascinates me and Lin-Manuel Miranda's journey of going from a college production to off-Broadway to becoming a Tony Award winning musical is no different. In The Heights is Lin-Manuel Miranda's memory of growing up in Manhattan's Washington Heights on the Upper West Side. Somehow, he captured the essence of his neighborhood, from the music and sounds of the area, the people and then freezing these personal and unique moments as a musical on stage.


In The Heights has me thinking about musical theater as an art form and why artists choose to tell their story as a musical versus a film, tv show, novel or poetry. What makes one more effective a genre than another? I suppose in part some of the same reasons that musical move and inspire me while film doesn't really at all...whatsoever. There is something I imagine about the uniqueness of In The Heights that makes it special and come alive specifically as a musical. I wouldn't actually know having never seen it, but having listened to it (a lot) since I bought it...there's definitely something special about it. How could we get a real sense of the neighborhood without the music or the vitality of these actors? Beyond all of that though, what could be better than watching and listening to Lin-Manuel Miranda performing onstage? He certainly is dynamic and talent is something he will never be short of, I am sure of that!

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

RIGHT AS THE RAIN

So I got a new CD that I just love! I've been aware of Victoria Clark's work (Titanic) but became even more interested in her career following her Tony Award winning performance of Margaret Johnson in The Light in the Piazza. Actually, if you keep up with NY theatre, then you of course know of Clark's work and thank god she was finally recognized...right? While I'm completely disappointed that I never got to see her said performance live, I did catch the broadcast of Piazza on PBS and have played the bejeezus out of my CD of the cast recording.

I knew she had an album coming out, I knew she was touring but for some reason never felt totally compelled to purchase the new album. I read nice reviews (ok just one, but then again that's the only review of her album I read) but again never got around to the album. Well the other day as I was cleaning out my iPod, it finally dawned on me that I didn't have it, so I downloaded it on iTunes (I really wanted to purchase a hard copy, but at the same time I had a severe case of needing some immediate gratification). Lets just say its been two days and her album hasn't stopped playing. I just love it! This is the best solo album I've heard in a long time. Often times I'll listen to a solo album and not love it, but love the artist so I listen to it and find tracks to appreciate while loving few of the other ones. This was so not the case with Clark's album, Fifteen Minutes of Grace. The only downside of the immediate gratification of getting an album from iTunes...NO LINER NOTES! I rather love reading liner notes and obsessively reading the lryics and now I have to search for said lyrics on the internet instead.

LOVE it! Go buy it!

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

MAY WE ENTERTAIN YOU?

The demand for cast recordings has certainly diminished from days-gone-by when songs from musical theatre were a common part of pop culture -- among others, Sinatra covered "The Lady is a Tramp" from "Guys & Dolls" and Louis Armstrong made famous the title song from "Hello Dolly." TheaterMania.com has an interesting article on the new landscape of the past, present and future of the cast recording from prominent record executives: Brian Drutman (Decca Broadway), Hugh Fordin (DRG), Tommy Krasker (PS Classics), Kurt Deutsch (Sh-K-Boom/Ghostlight), and Bill Rosenfield (Sony/BMG).

* * *
What's Up With Cast Albums?
Five record company executives talk about the past, present, and future of musical theater recordings.
Fifty years ago, recorded music was disseminated to the public on easily scratchable vinyl LPs that were sold in places called "record stores." Today, without setting foot out of their houses, many people obtain the tunes they want in digital form via downloading -- sometimes legally, sometimes not. The recording industry has changed almost beyond recognition. And the musical theater repertoire, once the backbone of the industry, has become more and more marginalized, with a few stunning exceptions. TheaterMania recently spoke with record company executives Brian Drutman (Decca Broadway), Hugh Fordin (DRG), Tommy Krasker (PS Classics), Kurt Deutsch (Sh-K-Boom/Ghostlight), and Bill Rosenfield (Sony/BMG) about the business and art of making cast albums.

********************

THEATERMANIA: Brian, I understand that the Decca Broadway recording of Wicked has sold spectacularly well.


BRIAN DRUTMAN: Yes. As of now, it has sold half a million copies, so it's been certified gold by the recording industry. Very few show albums are that successful; Mamma Mia! is the only other one I can think of at the moment. Spamalot has also done very well, but Wicked is a phenomenon, partly because the show is playing in so many places. That really does help CD sales. The more productions you have, the more opportunities you have to sell the record at the theater, and so on.

TM: Was that album an easier sell -- or, I should say, an easier buy -- than others that Decca signed on to do?

BD: The questions we're always faced with are (1) is the show good and will it play for awhile, and (2) is the recording something that people are going to buy? There are many examples where a show has done well but the recording hasn't. Just breaking even really isn't sufficient for larger companies like Decca, Universal, and BMG because of the money that you're spending not just to make the recording but also in terms of marketing and all that. I do a lot of reissues, as you know, and those are different; because the recording costs are already paid for, if I just make back the cost of remastering an album, that's considered a success. With a new recording, the stakes are much higher -- and so are the expectations. I'm grateful that smaller companies record for posterity small shows that a big company would never touch because the profit margin's too small or the profit won't come for years.

TM: But even a recording of a flop show can make tons of money over time. I very much doubt that, as the decades passed, Columbia was sorry it recorded Candide.

BD: No, I'm sure they weren't. This is a legacy that we have.

TM: In the wake of Wicked, do you think Decca will record more new shows and reissue more of the older cast albums?

BD: I wish! People asked me the same thing after Mamma Mia! That cast album sold a million and a quarter copies. Friends of mine said, "Well, you did Mamma Mia! so now you can do Ankles Aweigh." I think the company trusts my judgment, but I don't think they're going to give me a longer rope. That's just the nature of this beast -- and, in a sense, that's why smaller companies like P.S. Classics and Sh-K-Boom are doing well. A lot of big shows want to go with a big company because their return will be larger; for example, there was a lot of competition for the recording of The Color Purple, the way there is with movie soundtracks. But the shows that are a little bit thornier may go begging for a recording.

TM: Of course, nothing is certain. Wicked wasn't guaranteed to be a hit.

BD: Absolutely not. It's hard to know what's going to excite people and what isn't. All Shook Up did not do the kind of numbers that make record companies happy. In the case of Wicked, we certainly did not know for sure that it would be a huge hit when we committed to record it. Another show we recorded, Seussical, was touted as the second coming. We were in a bidding war with BMG over that one, and look what happened! The show was a disaster. The recording has recouped but only because of the road tour. It's still considered a fiasco.

MP: What's coming up for Decca?

BD: We're looking, and we're taking all suggestions and ideas -- whatever people think is going to be a big hit. Have you heard of anything?

********************


TM: Hugh, I'm sure I speak for all musical theater buffs when I say that we love you and DRG for putting out so many new recordings and reissues -- even if some of us can't understand how most of those albums can possibly break even, let alone be profitable.

HUGH FORDIN: Well, we had to give up recording the Encores! series because those CDs just didn't pay off at all. The unions were not being cooperative, particularly Equity. They felt that each of those shows should be treated just like a Broadway show in terms of the recording contract. When we did get them to give in a little, it was only because the musicians union gave in a little -- but not very much. It still became prohibitive because of the very large casts and orchestra.

TM: Do you mean that Equity wanted to stick with the usual rule for recording Broadway shows, where all of the cast members get a week's salary for the session?

HF: It can actually be more than a week's salary. Here's how it works: You get $182 for each solo or duet you do, so if you've got 10 solos, that's $1,820. So even if you're only making $1,350 a week in the show, you're getting $1,820 for the album. And if any song is longer than three minutes and 10 seconds, then it's considered a song and a half, and you're paid accordingly.

TM: What about the reissues? They're far less expensive to do, so I'm assuming that they pay off much sooner.

HF: Yes. For the most part, the label that licenses the recording also manufactures the CD for you -- so they're making money both in royalties and in making the discs, and we don't have to put up anything upfront. The only thing that really costs us is creating the packaging. Sometimes, they don't give us any artwork because it doesn't exist, and sometimes we add to the artwork because it was originally an LP or it was a CD with only a four-page booklet, and now we want to do an eight-page booklet. But, expense-wise, that's not of any great consequence.

TM: Of your reissues, which ones have sold much better than you would have expected?

HF: The Capitol series, for the most part, has done very well: The Gay Life, Top Banana, and Plain and Fancy. Our biggest seller has turned out to be Brigadoon, [the studio cast album with Shirley Jones and Jack Cassidy]. I didn't know that there was going to be that big a demand for it, but I wanted to reissue it because I knew how wonderful it was.

TM: And the biggest dissapointments...?

HF: One that was a disappointment to me was The Girl Most Likely. It was supposed to be paired with a 10-inch Capitol album called Three Sailors and a Girl that Jane Powell did with Gordon MacRae and Jackie Leonard. It was a good movie score. It was done in the Capitol studios, but they claimed they didn't own the master. They said, "We have the tape but we don't have the contract."

TM: How do you feel about downloading?

HF: Of course, we do a lot of business in downloading, but we would never limit ourselves to that because there are a lot of older people who will not go out and buy a computer. What are you going to do with those people? You make it difficult for them when you say, "Look, the only way you can get this obscure album is to order it online." I feel sorry for them, but there's nothing I can do; I can't send them a complimentary computer!

********************


TM: Tommy, what's your overview of the cast album industry as it now stands?

TOMMY KRASKER: I think we're all sort of looking for new models to finance the recordings, and I'm sure that's what everybody else has been talking about; I certainly know it's one thing that Kurt [Deutsch] has been very involved in over the last couple of years. We're no longer in an era where the major labels are automatically going to swoop in and pick up any Broadway cast albums, and that's one of the reasons a company as young as PS Classics is doing them. I didn't start PS Classics thinking I'd be doing Broadway cast albums within two years.

TM: Can you give some examples of new financing models?

TK: We have been able to raise the money for some of our recordings ourselves, but there are others where the theater companies have had an interest in seeing these works preserved, so they have come aboard and helped us finance or raise the financing for the albums. I think Lincoln Center was forthright about it in terms of The Frogs; they very much wanted to see the work preserved. We had just come off Assassins and I said to them, "Quite frankly, I don't have all the money to bring to the table for The Frogs, but I can bring a certain amount if you can bring a certain amount."

TM: For the most part, the major labels no longer seem interested in cast albums because most of them don't sell hundreds of thousands of copies upon their initial release, though they may sell very well over time as more people get to see the shows on Broadway and as they begin to be done around the country in community theaters and schools.

TK: I think that's true. There aren't as many major labels as there were, and there certainly aren't as many major labels that have Broadway divisions. I don't think BMG or Decca Broadway or even EMI are going to leave the cast album business entirely, but -- with the rare exception of something like Wicked -- the recordings are certainly not going to sell the way pop albums do. Maybe Wicked is the exception that keeps us all going.

TM: But aren't the larger companies in a better position to say, "This recording isn't going to make a lot of money right away but eventually, over 30 years or more, it'll make a nice profit." Ironically, it's the smaller companies -- which presumably have less money in the bank and therefore need an earlier return on their investment -- that commit to record the non-blockbuster shows.

TK: I can only speak for PS Classics and say that we have a smaller overhead, so we can afford to be patient. I'm always reticent about speaking for other labels, but it's fair to say that a lot of them have been taken over by their pop divisions in recent years. In the old days, in terms of classical labels, there were always recordings that were prestige items. They might break even, they might lose a little money, they might take three years to recoup -- but they were important and, therefore, they were worth doing. It's different than pop labels, where they expect to sell a couple million units in the first couple of weeks. That's an exaggeration, but you know what I'm saying. It's a different mentality.

TM: How do you feel about downloading?

TK: All of our CDs are available at iTunes, but I don't see any point in the future when we're going to make materials available only for download. If anything, we're trying to make our CD packages as lavish as we can. We think people like to look at those things, especially in the case of Broadway shows. You have to remember, there's an audience outside New York that may never get to see these productions; I want them to relive the experience not only by listening to the CD but also by thumbing through the booklet and seeing the photographs, reading the lyrics and the essays. If something is only downloadable, you lose all that. Ironically, some people have actually said that our packages have gotten too extravagant. I thought, "Well, I'm sorry we gave you a 48-page booklet!"

TM: What's next for PS Classics?

TK: We'll see what comes down the pike. If someone told me that we'd be doing Nine two years in, or that last year we would have done Fiddler and Assassins, I would have laughed at them. But these opportunities keep presenting themselves.

********************


TM: Kurt, can you give a brief description of how the Sh-K-Boom and Ghostlight recordings are financed.

KURT DEUTSCH: Well, what we've been doing for the past year or so is that we've been working with the producers, and they are co-owning the albums. The producer or group of producers will invest in the album the way they invest in the show. I act as executive producer or producer, depending on how involved I am in the studio. Then we distribute the CD and work with the producers to find interesting ways to market it.

TM: You've often made the point that a recording promotes future productions of a show.

KD: Right. Without a cast album, most shows probably wouldn't get done. The Last 5 Years is a perfect example. The album came out three weeks before the show closed. Had we not made the album, people probably would have forgotten about the show -- but now, just about every musical theater student in the country has that CD, and the show has had productions all over the world. It's the same with Amour. That was recently done at Goodspeed, and I think there's going to be a London production. Without the cast album, I guarantee you that the performers wouldn't have been nominated for Tonys and the show wouldn't have been nominated. Gerry Schoenfeld believed in Amour so much that he said, "We have to make an album." And they did.

TM: Is it fair to make the generalization that the major labels are largely uninterested in cast albums nowadays?

KD: I wouldn't say they're not interested, but we're offering a different way to do the recordings. Little Women, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, and Spelling Bee all had deals on the table from major labels, but we offered a different scenario with different revenue streams and a different model. Marty Bell invested in The Last 5 Years and it actually paid off for him, so he said, "I want to do the same thing with Dirty Rotten."

TM: How are the performers remunerated for their participation in cast albums?

KD: As of yet, I haven't tried to get the unions to change the way that business is done. The performers get a week's salary for every eight hours they're in a studio, and then the way the residuals are determined is very complicated. Basically, the artists get a very, very small percentage of the producer's portion, which is based on a ridiculously slow recoupment schedule. Because a cast album benefits everybody, I think it would make more sense to have everybody make minimum but then pay everybody some kind of percentage from the first record sold. That way, if the album does well, everyone will benefit; if the album doesn't do well and the show doesn't end up succeeding, then at least no one person or group of persons will have lost tons of money, and there will still be a recording of the show.

TM: You've mentioned that there's a studio crunch these days.

KD: It's a bad situation. Right now, there's really only one studio in New York where you can record a cast album. It'd be great to be able to go into the theaters and record live; the technology exists where we could bring a ProTools unit into the theater, isolate the singers and the instruments, record five shows over the course of a week, and then edit the performances together to make a great album. But if we were to do that now, we'd have to pay all of the unions for full eight-hour shifts. It would only work if we could have a blanket payment for the union people.

TM: Why should you have to pay them extra? You'd just be recording performances that they're already being paid to work. It sounds idiotic.

KD: Yeah, but the whole business is based on a lot of archaic rules that were made when major labels were paying for everything. There's a rule that says you're not allowed to use production photographs in your CD artwork unless you pay the stagehands, because they were there working when those photographs were taken. In our CD booklet for The New Moon, we couldn't use pictures of the singers in their costumes because we would have had to pay an astronomical amount of money to the stagehands' union. Of course, that prevents the photographer from earning more money, and it makes the CD package look not so good. We can't pay $10,000 to the unions in order to use those photos. It's a shame, but I hope things will change as people become more educated about the music business and understand that there's a way for us all to benefit from it.

TM: Record piracy is a huge problem. Would you like to say something about that?

KD: Yes. Piracy affects cast albums more than other types of music because the number of people who buy those albums is getting smaller -- so if you copy them, it really hurts. That's the thing you have to stress in your article: If people like musical theater albums and want these things to continue, they should plop down the $15 or whatever it costs to buy the CD and tell their friends to do the same.

TM: How severely is the market shrinking?

KD: Well, Wicked has sold a lot of records, whereas "art shows" don't sell as much. I think The Light in the Piazza is an incredibly beautiful score that, over the long term, will make its money back as an album -- but, initially something like that is not going to sell as many records as Wicked. Little Women has the potential of selling a lot of records because of Maureen [McGovern] and Sutton [Foster], but also because the show is now on a 60-city tour and it's going to be done in every high school for years to come. So the market really depends on what the show is.

********************


TM: Bill, it goes without saying that Sony/BMG has a huge back catalogue of cast albums that were originally released on the RCA and Columbia labels -- everything from Hello, Dolly! to All American. What's the future of those recordings in terms of availability?

BILL ROSENFIELD: it seems pretty clear that everything that has been previously digitized by RCA and Sony will be downloadable in the future, because it costs the companies so little to make that material downloadable. The most popular recordings will also be available on CD, but I think recordings of more obscure shows will only be available as downloads and not as hard discs to buy in a store. I would be hesitant to say what we might consider to be "obscure."

TM: What is your position with the newly merged Sony/BMG company?

BR: I'm a consultant, at least until the end of December. I've been working as a consultant to BMG since they fired me from the position of senior vice president of shows and soundtracks. It's been great. When was the last time you were fired from a job and they continued to pay you some money four years later? I'm a lucky guy that way.

TM: What's the future of cast albums?

BR: I think it's very bright because the realization that they're specialized items meant for a limited audience has finally kicked in -- not just with the big record companies but also with the theatrical producers, composers, and creative artists involved. They no longer look at their show albums as having potential radio hits; they look at them realistically as souvenirs of the shows and as marketing tools. Now that there's some sort of perception of reality, the smaller labels like Sh-K-Boom/Ghostlight and PS Classics can step up to the plate and do quality work with major shows, rather than being relegated to only doing the minor shows. Sh-K-Boom's Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is a great example where the record company, the show's producers, and the composer-lyricist were all of the same mind as to what to do about the album. They were all utterly realistic, and I admire that.

TM: Do you regret the fact that so many shows nowadays are not recorded by the major labels?

BR: The truth is that those labels work on a fiscal system where an album has to show a profit within six to 10 months in a given year; if not, they write off the cost of the project and it's considered a failure. Because big record companies are now owned by major conglomerates, they can't afford to take the long view, because everyone's job is on the line every year. Your boss doesn't want to hear, "We spent $600,000 on this album and, even though we only sold 50,000 copies this year, over the next 10 years we're going to sell 800,000." They want the sales now. This is what I was up against when I was working for RCA. What makes the smaller labels ideal for these projects is that they actually care about the repertoire and deal with it in a realistic, affectionate manner.

TM: One final question: Is there any hope of getting people to stop calling cast albums "soundtracks"?

BR: None whatsoever. It's over! I fought it so hard for so many years, but at this point, it's silly. We just have to let go of it.


Related Posts with Thumbnails